Don’t you know who you’re dealing with here? My first essay ever, in Nonfiction 1 four years ago, came back with an A+ and a stickie note on it that said, “You are a gifted writer.” (see photo left) My senior seminar teacher told me that my writing was reminiscent of Hemingway and that I was in the top 2% of all the writing students he has taught over the last 29 years. Don’t you know who I am?
Well, that’s okay because I don’t either. I can't send you my best stuff because it’s highly autobiographical, with liberal creative embellishments, and despite the fact it is entitled My Notebook Stories: My Father, My Joy, which sounds like a tribute and a compliment, my father would take it as nothing less than a reprehensible invasion of privacy that's not completely true, and he would probably never speak to me again. Same goes with my sisters, who, after my weekend visits, sometimes prod me about the latest news from home, which I am unwilling to give, since I don’t want their ideas about my father formed by my less-than-perfect observations taken in a limited time frame. So you get my second best work, not my very best, and you reward it with these damned rejection letters―some nice, some not so nice―and it's driving me nuts.
To add more confusion to my already muddled thinking, I have chosen a piece entitled Dark Edges for my MFA master thesis, and the Admissions director, who is also my adviser, preferred My Notebook Stories: My Father, My Joy. “Brilliantly constructed,” she said over the phone, “So intricate and revealing, yet sensitive.” Oh, brother, wouldn’t you know? “Here’s Dark Edges,” I think. “Please take another look.”
Anyway, back to the reject guys. You aren’t even the best magazines that have rejected me. You are the also-rans, the second bests, like my submissions. I have been rejected by the fine likes of Brevity and Dislocate and Collision and I’m sure a dozen other premier sites whose names I’ve thankfully forgotten by now. Selective memory keeps my pride in place, and God only knows where I'd be without my pride.
As I sit here, I am aware of the critic on my shoulder, who, as I ramble on purposelessly, is telling me that if this ragtag writing is my blog for today, I am a very unfocused, very shallow person. I should be writing about sultry, dark sex with a secret, forbidden partner who worships me, or a poignant moment, where I wanted to throw myself off a bridge, but couldn’t because the sun was setting to make room for the full moon as it glowed brighter and brighter in the deepening twilight sky. Or the heartache of some unrequited love (and there are so many), or an earth-shattering self revelation that stopped me dead in my tracks, or a triumph over an unimaginable hardship that would submerge a less hearty soul. Life-changing, pivotal, weighty moments. Ah, hell. Sometimes I’m there, sometimes not.
So I look through my window to see a spring day, loaded with steel-wool balls that have hijacked the blue and broil around in the sky, threatening to unleash buckets and bolts, and make everyone complain bitterly about our lack of sun. I love these days. Perfect writing days, with the sky looming about, reminding us how little control we really have. What we do have is our opinions, our petty, ego-driven opinions, which we form from evidence that we bend in order to support our opinions. Imperfection at its best.
Okay, that’s my deep for today. Shallow is as shallow does. Rambling is as rambling does. And I’m content to sit here typing and be okay with coming up with nothing mind-boggling―no conclusions, no startling revelations―which is okay for now because all is well in my world, despite the two rejection letters I received this morning. “Good,” I say, forcing my fists to unclench and my lips to smile. “I have two more pieces to circulate into other markets.” Onward and ahoy! (or whatever)
The end.
From Louise